Lesson 53

Revelation  - Study of Things to Come

Destruction of Babylon the Great  Chapter 17-18

 

The Larger Context Examined

1. The Larger context in which these 2 chapters are positioned also underscores the parallelism between the chapters.

 

2. Chapter 17 & 18 are an interlude placed here to explain the destruction of Babylon the Great mentioned in 16:19b, prophesied in 14:8.

 

3. In the song of praise found in 19:1-3 immediately following this great event; heaven is said to rejoice over this fall of Babylon.

 

4. In describing the fall, those in heaven mention the harlot, 19:2, cp. 17:1;

Also mentioned is the smoke rises up forever, 19:3  cp. 18:9,18.

Both being related to one judgment.

 

5. Conclusion: the wider context limits the chapters 17 & 18 to such an extent that the Babylons they are describing must be considered identical.

 

6. The larger context actually can be traced back to 14:8 which first predicts an angel flying in mid-heaven proclaiming "Fallen, fallen is Babylon the great, she who has made all the nations drink of the wine of the passion of here immorality."

 

7. The next appearance of Babylon is during the outpouring of the 7th and final bowl of wrath in 16:19b.

 

 

8. The subject of the fall of Babylon does not end with chapters 17 & 18 but extends into chapter 19.

 

 

* Do you see the significance of the sequence here?

In 18:20 the angels call for praise and rejoicing over the fall of Babylon.

In 19:2 the praise focuses on the harlot of chapter 17.

 

** Conclusion is that the praise song of 19 incorporates elements of both chapters 17 and 18 and clearly is a song celebrating just one fall and doing that in response to the command of 18:20.

 

 

The Interpretive Keys within these Chapters

 

 

1. Description of Babylon as a Harlot

- This allusion to a harlot has caused many to identify Babylon as a false religious system.

 

 

- The figure of the harlot was clearly used in the Old Testament to describe God's view of man's association with idolatry, religion.

 

 

- Conclusion: Babylon is identified as a harlot not some religious sys.

 

- It is interesting I think that the figure of a harlot in the OT was never applied to religious system only.  As so many want to do today!

 

2. The Explanation of Babylon as a Mystery!

We need to analyze just what does musth,rion in 17:5 refers to where Babylon is described as a "mystery."

 

 

Two problems that need to be resolved at this point.

#1. To Determine the grammatical relationship between the word musth,rion and the title of the woman.

 

- Either John is saying that the name on the woman's forehead is "Mystery Babylon the Great" or he is saying that, Babylon.

 

 

- Walvoord notes this when he writes,

"The word mystery is a descriptive reference to the title, not a part of the title itself as implied by the capitalization in the translation.

 

#2. The second problem that must be addressed is the exact nature of the mystery.  In what way then is Babylon a mystery?

 

- The problem with all of this is that the use of musth,rion with something mystical or mysterious cannot be justified by N.T. usage of the word.

 

- W.E. Vine (Expository Dictionary of N.T)  "In the N.T. [musth,rion]  denotes, not the mysterious (as is noted by the Eng. word usage) but that which, being outside the range of unassisted natural apprehension, can be made known only by Divine revelation, and is made known in a manner and at a time appointed by God, and to those who are illumined by His Spirit."

 

- Point is that the word does not denote the quality or character of the truth; rather it focuses on the availability of the truth.

 

- Its designation as a mystery means that the vision being given to John had not been made known before.

 

3. The Identification of Babylon as a city

- There is no lack of opinion as to the identification of the harlot called Babylon.

 

- Whatever else is said about the harlot, the woman, she is first a city, not an ecclesiastical system.

 

 

4. The Location of Babylon on seven hills  (heard often today)

 

 

- The view that this refers to Rome has some very serious flaws.

1. The assumed relationship between the woman and the hills.

The 7 heads are associated with the Beast not the woman.

[7 heads are 7 mountains....they are 7 kings]

2. There is a clear distinction between the woman and the beast;  and it is the beast that has the 7 heads!

The angel recognized this distinction in vs:7.

3. If you say the seven hills are Rome, then the most that can be determined is that the Beast (GWD; A/JC) will have his HQ in the city of Rome; It does not give the location of the Harlot since she is not part of the beast.

4. An argument is made that the harlot is still to be associated with the Beast since it says in vs:9 "seven mountains on which the woman sits."